KAJIAN TINGKAT KOMPLEKSITAS MASALAH PADA BUKU PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA BERBASIS TAKSONOMI SOLO
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mathematics is an important subject in schools, as well as among other complex subjects. Of the various difficulties of research, it is always difficult for mathematics to be the most important subject for every student. Students have difficulties that can make mistakes when working on math problems. One way to identify the appropriateness of students' responses to math problems is the SOLO taxonomy. SOLO taxonomy plays a role in determining the quality of student responses to the problems faced. Researchers used a Student Textbook entitled "Senang Belajar Matematika Untuk Siswa SD/MI Kelas 5" to classify math problems based on the SOLO taxonomy. This research is a qualitative study using content analysis. The results of the study resulted in prestructural 0%, unistructural 14.1%, multistructural 32%, relational 42.9%, and extended abstract 10.8%. The research result is also a type of mathematical problem with a scale of 156 questions. Not many types of questions with prestructural level are found in this book because the types of questions, in general, are at the beginning of the lesson which is made by the teacher himself. However, the results also show that the level of complexity of questions that are extended to abstract is not too much found in the examples of questions presented in this textbook. It is advisable to add variations to the extended abstract level question, because at this age students are already able to work on questions with a more difficult level of thinking.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Muassis Pendidikan Dasar memiliki hak penerbitan setiap artikel, adapun isi konten artikel sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab penulis
References
Abdullah, A. H., Mokhtar, M., Halim, N. D. A., Ali, D. F., Tahir, L. M., & Kohar, U. H. A. (2017). Mathematics Teachers’ Level of Knowledge and Practice on the Implementation of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00601a
Anisimova, T. I., Sabirova, F. M., & Shatunova, O. V. (2020). Formation of Design and Research Competencies in Future Teachers in the Framework of STEAM Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(02), 204. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11537
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: the SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.
Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1989). Towards a Model of School-based Curriculum Development and Assessment Using the SOLO Taxonomy. Australian Journal of Education, 33(2), 151–163.
Bush, S. B., Cook, K. L., Edelen, D., & Cox, R. (2020). Elementary Students’ STEAM Perceptions. The Elementary School Journal, 120(4), 692–714. https://doi.org/10.1086/708642
Chan, C. C., Tsui, M. S., Chan, M. Y. C., & Hong, J. H. (2002). Applying the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) Taxonomy on Student’s Learning Outcomes: an Empirical Study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000020282
Chick, H. (1998). Cognition in the Formal Modes: Research Mathematics and the SOLO Taxonomy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10(2), 4–26.
Colucci-Gray, L. (2019). Developing an Ecological View through STEAM Pedagogies in Science Education. In Why Science and Art Creativities Matter (pp. 105–130). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004421585_008
Colucci-Gray, Laura, Burnard, P., Gray, D., & Cooke, C. (2019). A Critical Review of STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics). In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.398
Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). STEAM teaching professional development works: effects on students’ creativity and motivation. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00132-9
Cousins, B. (2018). Design Thinking: Organizational Learning in VUCA Environments. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(2). https://www.abacademies.org/articles/design-thinking-organizational-learning-in-vuca-environments-7117.html
Dart, B. (1998). Teaching for Improved Learning in Small Classes. In Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Australian Council for Educational Research.
Gamazo, A., & Martínez-Abad, F. (2020). An Exploration of Factors Linked to Academic Performance in PISA 2018 Through Data Mining Techniques. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575167
Hanberger, A. (2014). What PISA Intends To and Can Possibly Achieve: a critical programme theory analysis. European Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 167–180.
Hattie, J., & Purdie, N. (1998). The SOLO Model: Addressing Fundamental Measurement Issues. In B. Dart & G. M. Boulton-Lewis (Eds) Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Australian Council for Educational Research.
Herliani. (2016). Penggunaan Taksonomi SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) pada Pembelajaran Kooperatif Truth and Dare dengan Quick on the Draw untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Siswa pada Biologi SMA. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 13(1), 232–236.
Hom, E. J. (2014). What is STEM Education? Www.Livescience.Com. https://www.livescience.com/43296-what-is-stem-education.html
Jimoyiannis, A. (2011). Using SOLO Taxonomy To Explore Students’ Mental Models Of The Programming Variable And The Assignment Statement. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 4(2), 53–74.
Korkmaz, F., & Unsal, S. (2017). Analysis of Attainments and Evaluation Questions in Sociology Curriculum According to the SOLO Taxonomy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 69, 75–92.
Kusuma, M. D., Rosidin, U., Abdurrahman, & Suyatna, A. (2017). The Development of Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Instrument Assessment In Physics Study. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(1), 26–32.
Lin, C.-L., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2021). The Effect of a Pedagogical STEAM Model on Students’ Project Competence and Learning Motivation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09885-x
Lucander, H., Bondemark, L., Brown, G., & Knutsson, K. (2010). The Structure of Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) Taxonomy: a Model to Promote Dental Students’ Learning. European Journal of Dental Education, 14, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2009.00607.x
Marín-Marín, J.-A., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Dúo-Terrón, P., & López-Belmonte, J. (2021). STEAM in education: a bibliometric analysis of performance and co-words in Web of Science. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00296-x
Mega, A. P. (2017). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Pada Materi Geometri Berdasarkan Taksonomi Solo Kelas VII MTs. Muhammadiyah Tanetea Kabupaten Jeneponto.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
Novriania, M. R., & Surya, E. (2017). Analysis of Student Difficulties in Mathematics Problem Solving Ability at MTs SWASTA IRA Medan. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 33(3), 63–75.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Science Performance (PISA). Oecd.Org.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
Pratiwi, D., & Budiyono. (2016). Kompleksitas Pertanyaan Dalam Contoh-Contoh Soal Buku Teks Matematika Kelas VII SMP/MTs Semester I Berdasarkan Taksonomi SOLO. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY 2016, 23(2), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.37729/ekuivalen.v23i2.3167
Sanwidi, A. (2018). Analisisi Kesalahan Mahasiswa Matematika UNU Blitar Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Materi Fungsi Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson. Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 3(1), 128–132. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.28926/briliant .v3i1.138
Saputri, R. R., Sugiarti, T., Murtikusuma, R. P., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Yudianto, E. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Fungsi Berdasarkan Kriteria Watson Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender Siswa SMP Kelas VIII. Kadikma, 9(2), 59–68.
Septriana, M. D., Hobri, & Fatahillah, A. (2015). Analisis Deskriptif Level Pertanyaan Pada Soal Cerita di Buku Teks Matematika SMK Program Keahlian Rumpun Seni, Pariwisata, dan Teknologi Kerumahtanggaan Kelas XI Penerbit Pusat Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Berdasarkan Taksonomi SOLO. Pancaran, 4(3), 61–68.
Soeharto, & Rosmaiyadi. (2018). The Analysis Of Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) In Wave And Optics Using IRT With Winstep Software. Journal of Educational Science and Technology, 4(3), 145–150. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26858/est.v1i1.7001
Watson, M. K., Pelkey, J., Rodgers, M. O., & Noyes, C. R. (2014). Exploring Student Sustainability Knowledge using the Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) Taxonomy. 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.